I was standing in my garage last weekend, staring at about forty pounds of dragon stone scattered across newspaper, when my neighbor Ken wandered over with his usual Saturday beer in hand. “Building another fish tank?” he asked, and I tried to explain that I wasn’t just building a tank – I was trying to recreate the feeling of standing next to Multnomah Falls when the morning light hits the mist just right. Ken nodded politely and changed the subject to the Blazers.
This is the thing about aquascaping that took me way too long to figure out. Everyone talks about plant species and CO2 injection and substrate layering, but nobody talks about the moment when you stop thinking like a biologist and start thinking like an artist. For me, that moment came about four years ago during what I now call “the great classroom tank disaster of 2019.”
I’d been running planted tanks in my classroom for a few years by then, mostly focusing on creating stable ecosystems that could handle the chaos of middle school life. The tanks looked fine – healthy plants, happy fish, decent enough that parents would comment during conferences. But they were boring. Really boring. Like the aquatic equivalent of beige wall paint.
The disaster happened during spring break. I’d set up this elaborate new layout over the weekend before vacation, spent hours arranging plants in neat little rows, carefully measured spacing, perfect symmetry. Very precise. Very… lifeless. I was so proud of my technical execution that I took photos to share with other teacher groups online.
When I came back from break, something had shifted. Maybe it was the week of different lighting patterns, or the automatic feeder distributing food differently, or just random tank chaos. But several of my carefully planted stems had grown sideways, one piece of driftwood had somehow rotated (probably thanks to my cory catfish), and the whole left side of the tank looked completely different.
And it looked amazing.
The accidental asymmetry, the natural growth patterns, the way the shifted driftwood now seemed to point toward the corner instead of sitting there like a dead log – it all had this organic flow that my perfectly planned layout never achieved. My students noticed immediately. “Mr. Johnson, your fish tank looks like a real river now!” one of them said, and I realized she was absolutely right.
That’s when I started paying attention to actual rivers and forests instead of just other people’s aquarium photos. Started carrying a camera on family hiking trips (much to my wife’s annoyance when I’d stop every few feet to photograph interesting rock formations). Began sketching tree arrangements and studying how shadows fell across creek beds.
The breakthrough came when I was designing what would become my most successful classroom tank – a 75-gallon long that I wanted to theme around Pacific Northwest streams. Instead of starting with a plant list, I started with a feeling. I wanted kids to look at this tank and feel like they were peering into one of those perfect swimming holes you find after hiking for hours.
I spent an entire Saturday arranging and rearranging pieces of driftwood, not thinking about biological filtration or planting zones, but about how water would flow around these obstacles in nature. How fallen logs create eddies and calm spots. How rocks force currents to split and rejoin. I must have moved the main focal piece – this gorgeous chunk of Manzanita – about twenty times before it felt right.
My daughter wandered into the garage at one point and asked why I was taking pictures of rocks from different angles. Good question. I was learning that composition in three dimensions is completely different from the flat layouts you see in most aquascaping guides. What looks balanced from the front viewing angle might be totally lopsided from the side. That perfect focal point might disappear entirely when you’re sitting on the classroom floor at kid-height.
The plants came later, chosen not just for their growth requirements but for how they’d contribute to the overall story. Fast-growing Vallisneria to mimic tall grasses swaying in current. Anubias and Java fern attached to wood because that’s how you actually see them in streams – growing on fallen logs, not planted in neat substrate rows. Moss to suggest age and establish, the way it covers everything in our Pacific Northwest forests.
But here’s what nobody tells you about the artistic side of aquascaping – it’s way harder than the technical stuff. I can test water parameters and calculate fertilizer doses all day long. I’ve got spreadsheets for plant growth rates and lighting schedules. That’s all problem-solving, and teachers are pretty good at problem-solving.
Most popular
Creating something that makes people stop and stare? That’s different. That requires this weird combination of planning and intuition that goes against my natural instincts to measure and control everything. Some of my best aquascaping decisions have been complete accidents or last-minute changes that felt right even though they violated all my careful planning.
The Northwest stream tank taught me about negative space, though I didn’t know that’s what it was called at the time. I’d left this large open area in the front corner because I couldn’t figure out what to plant there, and it was driving me crazy. Empty space felt like failure, like I hadn’t finished the job. But when the tank was finally set up and cycling, that open area became the most important part of the whole composition. It gave your eye somewhere to rest, created depth, made the planted areas feel more intentional rather than just “everywhere I could cram plants.”
My students started using that tank differently too. Instead of just tapping on the glass and asking when we were going to feed the fish, they’d sit quietly and watch. During indoor recess on rainy days, I’d find kids just staring into the tank, making up stories about what was happening in there. That’s when I knew I’d created something beyond just a container for aquatic life.
The color theory stuff came later, mostly through trial and error. I had this phase where I was obsessed with red plants – spent way too much money on Ludwigia and Rotala species, cranked up the lighting, dosed iron like crazy. The plants grew great, but the tank looked like Christmas threw up underwater. Way too much contrast, no harmony, exhausting to look at.
Now I think about plant colors the same way I think about choosing clothes (which, according to my wife, isn’t saying much, but bear with me). You can have one dramatic element – maybe a cluster of bright red Alternanthera – but everything else needs to support that choice, not compete with it. Lots of greens in different shades, some browns from wood and substrate, maybe a hint of silver from fish scales catching the light.
The tank I’m working on now is deliberately monochromatic – all greens, but ranging from the bright lime green of new Pogostemon helferi growth to the deep forest green of mature Anubias leaves. Sounds boring on paper, but the subtle variations create this incredibly peaceful, cohesive look that photographs beautifully and seems to lower everyone’s blood pressure when they look at it.
Texture has become my secret weapon for creating visual interest without relying on color contrasts. Pairing the tiny, delicate leaves of Hemianthus callitrichoides with the bold, wavy edges of Cryptocoryne wendtii. Using fine-leaved stem plants like Rotala rotundifolia behind broader foreground plants. It’s like creating a conversation between different plant personalities, and when it works, the whole tank feels alive even when the fish are hiding.
Scale is the trickiest part, especially in smaller tanks. I keep a small LEGO minifigure in my aquascaping toolkit – sounds ridiculous, but placing it in the tank during setup helps me maintain realistic proportions. That piece of driftwood might look like a massive fallen tree from outside the tank, but if the LEGO guy could walk over it easily, the illusion breaks down.
I’ve started thinking about my aquascapes as tiny theatrical sets, complete with foreground, midground, and background elements that create depth and draw the viewer’s eye through the composition. The best tanks have layers that reveal themselves slowly – details you notice after looking for a while, subtle arrangements that become more interesting the longer you study them.
This artistic approach has completely changed how I maintain tanks too. Trimming isn’t just about keeping plants healthy anymore – it’s about maintaining the composition, preserving sight lines, keeping the story coherent as everything grows and changes. Sometimes that means cutting back perfectly healthy plants because they’re disrupting the visual flow.
My wife thinks I’ve gotten a little obsessive about this stuff, and she’s probably right. I definitely spend too much time rearranging tiny pieces of wood and photographing substrate slopes from different angles. But when a tank finally clicks – when all the elements work together to create something that feels larger than the sum of its parts – that moment makes all the fussing worthwhile.
The kids get it too. They might not understand composition theory or color balance, but they can feel the difference between a tank that’s just alive and a tank that tells a story. And honestly, that’s all the validation I need.
Tom teaches middle-school science in Portland and uses aquascaping to bring biology to life for his students. His classroom tanks double as living labs—and his writing blends curiosity, humor, and a teacher’s knack for explaining complex stuff simply.
